Stepping stones cross a wide, shallow river. Many footprints on the near bank stop at the water.

Most people use AI. Few have changed how they work.

Our research follows one gap: where it comes from, what closes it, and what changes in the work when it closes. We publish the scoring method with the findings.

Method and score calculator

Many footprints stop at the water. Few cross the stones.

Our research has three studies, eight notes and five field notes.

Each title below is the finding of its piece.

A tall rock on the shore at low tide. Mussels and barnacles crowd its lower half, and only a few cling near the top.

Most regular AI users score in the lower half.

We scored 54 interview transcripts on AI capability. The median was 38 out of 100. Median scores fell from 55 in everyday chat to 12 in automation and agents.

Read the study

On a tidal rock, mussels and barnacles crowd the lower half and thin out toward the top.

A small young tree on an open plain at low sun. Its shadow runs far across the ground.

Confidence in AI runs far ahead of capability.

Confidence averaged 66 out of 100 and capability 37. Confidence ran higher in 53 of the 54 transcripts.

Read the study

At low sun, a small tree casts a shadow many times its own height.

Seen from above: pressed plants on paper sheets, laid out in neat rows, with a hand lens on one sheet.

More than 100 interviews show where people get stuck.

Who we spoke to, how we score what they say, and the 212 pain points coded from the first 38 interviews.

Read the study

Pressed plants, one to a sheet, sorted by kind.

Working on the same question?

We look for people to interview, data to compare against, and teams willing to test what we find. Leave a note and we will write back.